Renault Captur 2012 vs Peugeot 2008 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Captur is more dynamic to drive. Renault Captur engine produces 8 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Peugeot 2008. Thanks to more power Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Captur is 4 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Captur is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1194 litres | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Captur has 27 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The Peugeot 2008 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`658 | 1`582 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Peugeot 2008 is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Captur scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |