Porsche Cayenne 2002 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.5 Petrol | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is more dynamic to drive. Porsche Cayenne engine produces 150 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, but torque is 20 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Thanks to more power Porsche Cayenne reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.9 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 16.0 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Porsche Cayenne consumes 4.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Porsche Cayenne could require 705 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Porsche Cayenne consumes 5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Porsche Cayenne is 1 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, width is practically the same , while the height of Porsche Cayenne is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1770 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Cayenne is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`080 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Cayenne has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |