Peugeot Bipper 2010 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.6 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot Bipper engine produces 40 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Peugeot Bipper reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Peugeot Bipper is smaller, but higher. Peugeot Bipper is 42 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot Bipper is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
884 litres | 1684 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Peugeot Bipper has 72 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 800 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot Bipper is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Peugeot Bipper can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot Bipper has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |