Peugeot 607 2005 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 211 HP | 141 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 - 440 NM | 195 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 14.1 seconds | 9.7 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 10.2 | 6.1 - 9.3 | |
|
Peugeot 607 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Epica. On average, Peugeot 607 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 607 is 8 cm longer than the Chevrolet Epica, 3 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 607 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Peugeot 607 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 607 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 607 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica, which means Peugeot 607 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`101 | ~ 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 607 has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |