Peugeot 508 2014 vs Volvo C30 2009
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Peugeot 508 engine produces 6 HP more power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volvo C30. Despite the higher power, Peugeot 508 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.5 | |
|
The Peugeot 508 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 508 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that by driving the Peugeot 508 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1710 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1940 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 508 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S40, Volvo V50 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 508 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Peugeot 508 is larger. Peugeot 508 is 55 cm longer than the Volvo C30, 7 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 508 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1592 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot 508 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 508 has 309 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 508 is 1.6 metres more than that of the Volvo C30, which means Peugeot 508 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 508 has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |