Peugeot 5008 2016 vs Volvo XC60 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 5008 engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 5008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 55 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2017: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 236 mm (9.3 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Peugeot 5008 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Peugeot 5008 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 5008 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4, Peugeot 508, Citroen SpaceTourer | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo V60, Volvo V40 Cross Country, Volvo S90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC60 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 5008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Peugeot 5008 is smaller. Peugeot 5008 is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 5008 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 780 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1940 litres | 1432 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 5008 (by 508 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 5008 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Peugeot 5008 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`230 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 200 | 29 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 5008 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |