Peugeot 5008 2017 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 5008 engine produces 30 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, but torque is 105 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 5008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 6.7 | |
|
The Peugeot 5008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 5008 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Peugeot 5008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 5008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 236 mm (9.3 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Peugeot 5008 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Peugeot 5008 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C4, Peugeot 3008, Citroen Berlingo, Opel Grandland | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 5008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 5008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Peugeot 5008 is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 4 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 5008 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 780 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1940 litres | 1754 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 5008 (by 186 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 5008 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Peugeot 5008 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 5008 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |