Peugeot 4007 2009 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 4007 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 4007 engine produces 16 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Peugeot 4007 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 4007 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 4007 could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 4007 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 4007 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Citroen C-Crosser | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 4007 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Peugeot 4007 is 12 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 4007 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 955 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Peugeot 4007 has 46 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Peugeot 4007 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 4007 (by 731 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 4007 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 4007 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |