Peugeot 4007 2009 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 4007 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 4007 engine produces 6 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Peugeot 4007 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 4007 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 4007 could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 4007 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Citroen C-Crosser | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 4007 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 4007 is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 4007 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 986 litres | |
|
Peugeot 4007 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 4007 has 365 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 4007 (by 700 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 4007 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Peugeot 4007 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 4007 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |