Peugeot 306 1999 vs Seat Cordoba 1999

 
Peugeot 306
1999 - 2001
Seat Cordoba
1999 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP90 HP
Torque: 205 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13 seconds12.6 seconds
Seat Cordoba is a more dynamic driving.
Peugeot 306 and Seat Cordoba have the same engine power, but Peugeot 306 torque is 5 NM less than Seat Cordoba. Peugeot 306 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.24.9
Real fuel consumption: 5.8 l/100km5.2 l/100km
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Peugeot 306 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 306 could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 306 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1150 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1390 km on highway1120 km on highway
1030 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption
Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.27 m4.16 m
Width: 1.69 m1.64 m
Height: 1.38 m1.42 m
Peugeot 306 is larger, but slightly lower.
Peugeot 306 is 11 cm longer than the Seat Cordoba, 5 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 306 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 463 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`6351`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Seat Cordoba has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 306 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Seat Cordoba, so Seat Cordoba quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 8001000
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 306 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Seat Cordoba has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv