Peugeot 306 1999 vs Peugeot 106 1996

 
Peugeot 306
1999 - 2000
Peugeot 106
1996 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 135 HP118 HP
Torque: 180 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds8.7 seconds
Peugeot 306 engine produces 17 HP more power than Peugeot 106, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Peugeot 106. Despite the higher power, Peugeot 306 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.18.2
The Peugeot 106 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Peugeot 306 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 306 could require 135 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle540 km in combined cycle
850 km on highway710 km on highway
Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.03 m3.68 m
Width: 1.68 m1.59 m
Height: 1.35 m1.38 m
Peugeot 306 is larger, but slightly lower.
Peugeot 306 is 35 cm longer than the Peugeot 106, 9 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 306 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 340 litres215 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data953 litres
Peugeot 306 has more luggage capacity.
Peugeot 306 has 125 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 106.
Turning diameter: 10.9 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`385
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

below average
Peugeot 306 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 106, so Peugeot 306 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 306 has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Peugeot 106 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv