Peugeot 306 1999 vs Peugeot 106 1996

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Peugeot 306
1999 - 2001
Peugeot 106
1996 - 2003
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 2.01.0 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 70 - 112 HP50 - 118 HP
Torque: 111 - 205 NM74 - 145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 - 17.3 seconds8.7 - 19.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 8.35.3 - 8.8
Peugeot 306 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 106. On average, Peugeot 306 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.27 m3.68 m
Width: 1.69 m1.59 m
Height: 1.38 m1.38 m
Peugeot 306 is larger.
Peugeot 306 is 59 cm longer than the Peugeot 106, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 463 litres215 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data953 litres
Peugeot 306 has more luggage capacity.
Peugeot 306 has 248 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 106.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 306 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Peugeot 106.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`538~ 1`328
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 8001200
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 306 has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Peugeot 106 has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv