Peugeot 306 1999 vs Peugeot 206 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.1 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 70 - 135 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
Torque: | 111 - 205 NM | 94 - 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 17.2 seconds | 9.4 - 15.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.1 | 4.3 - 7.1 | |
Peugeot 306 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 206. On average, Peugeot 306 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.03 m | 3.82 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.43 m | |
Peugeot 306 is larger, but lower. Peugeot 306 is 21 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 3 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 306 is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 210 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1146 litres | 992 litres | |
Peugeot 306 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 306 has 130 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 306 (by 154 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 306 is 1 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Peugeot 306 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`519 | ~ 1`521 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 306 has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |