Peugeot 3008 2009 vs Renault Captur 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 3008 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 3008 engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Renault Captur. Thanks to more power Peugeot 3008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 3.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 3008 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 3008 could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 3008 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Captur might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 3008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Peugeot 3008 is larger. Peugeot 3008 is 14 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 6 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 3008 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1604 litres | 1235 litres | |
|
Peugeot 3008 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 3008 has 55 litres more trunk space than the Renault Captur. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 3008 (by 369 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 3008 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Renault Captur, which means Peugeot 3008 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`749 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Captur scores higher in safety tests. The Peugeot 3008 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 3008 has
|
Renault Captur has
| |