Peugeot 2008 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Peugeot 2008 engine produces 25 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 76 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 2008 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 2008 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi ASX 2012 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C4 Picasso, Citroen C4 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 2008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is smaller. Peugeot 2008 is 14 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1194 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Peugeot 2008 has 92 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi ASX (by 25 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`684 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |