Peugeot 2008 2013 vs Citroen C4 Cactus 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 254 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Cactus is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 8 HP less power than Citroen C4 Cactus, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Citroen C4 Cactus. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 3.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 4.6 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Cactus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 2008 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Cactus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 2008 could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 2008 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Cactus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1610 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1660 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 1080 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Cactus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Peugeot 2008 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Peugeot 2008 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C4 Picasso, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Cactus might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is larger. Peugeot 2008 and Citroen C4 Cactus are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 358 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1194 litres | 1170 litres | |
| Peugeot 2008 has 8 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Cactus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 24 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Cactus, which means Peugeot 2008 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`684 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Peugeot 2008 is better rated in child safety tests. The Peugeot 2008 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Citroen C4 Cactus has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Cactus, so Citroen C4 Cactus quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Citroen C4 Cactus has
| |