Peugeot 107 2012 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 60 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 108 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 - 14 seconds | 6.9 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 4.5 | 3.3 - 5.9 | |
|
Peugeot 107 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.43 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Peugeot 107 is smaller. Peugeot 107 is 54 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
712 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space. Peugeot 107 has 141 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 240 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 107 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Peugeot 107 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`190 | ~ 1`597 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Polo scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 107 has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |