Peugeot 107 2012 vs Renault Clio 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 (petrol) | 0.9 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 90 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 135 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 - 14 seconds | 6.7 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 4.5 | 3.2 - 6.3 | |
|
Peugeot 107 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.43 m | 4.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Peugeot 107 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 107 is 64 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 107 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
712 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Peugeot 107 has 161 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 107 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Peugeot 107 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`190 | ~ 1`653 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Clio scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 107 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |