Peugeot 106 1996 vs Peugeot 306 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 118 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 145 NM | 135 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
Peugeot 106 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 106 engine produces 28 HP more power than Peugeot 306, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Peugeot 306. Thanks to more power Peugeot 106 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.3 | |
The Peugeot 306 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 106 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 106 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
710 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.68 m | 4.03 m | |
Width: | 1.59 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.36 m | |
Peugeot 106 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 106 is 35 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 340 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
953 litres | no data | |
Peugeot 306 has more luggage space. Peugeot 106 has 125 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 306. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`385 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | average | |
Peugeot 306 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 106, so Peugeot 306 quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 106 has
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |