Peugeot 106 1996 vs Peugeot 206 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 50 - 118 HP | 60 - 177 HP | |
Torque: | 74 - 145 NM | 94 - 205 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 19.2 seconds | 7.5 - 15.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 8.8 | 4.3 - 7.9 | |
Peugeot 106 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 206. On average, Peugeot 106 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.68 m | 3.82 m | |
Width: | 1.59 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.43 m | |
Peugeot 106 is smaller. Peugeot 106 is 14 cm shorter than the Peugeot 206, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 1070 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
953 litres | 1130 litres | |
Peugeot 206 has more luggage space. Peugeot 106 has 855 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 177 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 106 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Peugeot 106 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`328 | ~ 1`514 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |