Peugeot 1007 2005 vs Ford C-Max 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 133 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 1007 engine produces 12 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 1007 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 1007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 1007 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that by driving the Peugeot 1007 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 1007 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford C-Max engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen C4, Citroen C2 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Fiesta, Ford Fusion | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 1007 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.73 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Peugeot 1007 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 1007 is 60 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 1007 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 154 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1192 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Peugeot 1007 has 396 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 428 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`855 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 1007 has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 1007 has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |