Peugeot 1007 2005 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 1007 engine produces 68 HP less power than Nissan Almera Tino, whereas torque is 154 NM less than Nissan Almera Tino. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 1007 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 6.6 | |
|
The Peugeot 1007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 1007 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera Tino, which means that by driving the Peugeot 1007 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen C2 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 1007 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 1007 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.73 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Peugeot 1007 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 1007 is 53 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera Tino, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 1007 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 154 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1192 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino has more luggage space. Peugeot 1007 has 286 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera Tino. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 758 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 1007 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera Tino. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`582 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 1007 has
|
Nissan Almera Tino has
| |