Peugeot 1007 2005 vs Ford C-Max 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 109 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 1007 engine produces 25 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 1007 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Peugeot 1007 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that by driving the Peugeot 1007 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 1007 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 460 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.73 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
| Peugeot 1007 is 60 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 1007 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 246 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1192 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Peugeot 1007 has 304 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 428 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`554 | 1`855 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 1007 has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 1007 has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |