Opel Tigra 2004 vs Ford Puma 1998

 
Opel Tigra
2004 - 2008
Ford Puma
1998 - 2000
Body: CabrioCoupe
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Diesel1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 70 HP90 HP
Torque: 170 NM122 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.5 seconds11.9 seconds
Ford Puma is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Tigra engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford Puma, but torque is 48 NM more than Ford Puma. Due to the lower power, Opel Tigra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.67.2
The Opel Tigra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Tigra consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma, which means that by driving the Opel Tigra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres40 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 970 km in combined cycle550 km in combined cycle
1150 km on highway670 km on highway
Opel Tigra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.98 m
Width: 1.68 m1.67 m
Height: 1.36 m1.34 m
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Tigra is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Puma, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Tigra is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 250 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
440 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Tigra is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford Puma, which means Opel Tigra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`510no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 26001000
Pros and Cons: Opel Tigra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Puma has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv