Opel Tigra 2004 vs Chrysler Sebring 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is a more dynamic driving. Opel Tigra engine produces 51 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 63 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Due to the lower power, Opel Tigra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 9.1 | |
|
The Opel Tigra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Tigra consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Opel Tigra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Opel Tigra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Opel Tigra is smaller. Opel Tigra is 100 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Tigra is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
440 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage space. Opel Tigra has 70 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Tigra is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`450 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Tigra has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |