Opel Tigra 2004 vs Nissan Micra 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel) | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 70 - 125 HP | 88 - 110 HP | |
Torque: | 125 - 170 NM | 128 - 153 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 15.5 seconds | 10.6 - 12.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 7.7 | 6.6 - 6.7 | |
Opel Tigra petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.92 m | 3.81 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.44 m | |
Opel Tigra is larger, but lower. Opel Tigra is 11 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Tigra is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 255 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
440 litres | 457 litres | |
Opel Tigra has 5 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 17 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Tigra is 1.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Opel Tigra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`473 | ~ 1`540 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Tigra has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |