Opel Tigra 1995 vs Ford Puma 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opel Tigra is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Ford Puma is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 1.4 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 106 HP | 90 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 - 148 NM | 122 - 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 14 seconds | 9.2 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 - 8.2 | 7.2 - 7.4 | |
|
Opel Tigra petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Puma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Opel Tigra is smaller. Opel Tigra is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Puma, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
425 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Tigra is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Puma, which means Opel Tigra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`337 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Tigra has
|
Ford Puma has
| |