Opel Signum 2007 vs BMW 1 series 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
BMW 1 series is a more dynamic driving. Opel Signum engine produces 13 HP less power than BMW 1 series, whereas torque is 20 NM less than BMW 1 series. Due to the lower power, Opel Signum reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Signum is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Opel Signum consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Signum could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Signum consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Signum gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Opel Signum) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 1 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra | Used also on BMW 3 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Opel Signum is larger. Opel Signum is 42 cm longer than the BMW 1 series, 5 cm wider, while the height of Opel Signum is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 365 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1410 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Opel Signum has more luggage capacity. Opel Signum has 35 litres more trunk space than the BMW 1 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Signum (by 260 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Signum is 0.4 metres more than that of the BMW 1 series, which means Opel Signum can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| BMW 1 series has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Signum, so BMW 1 series quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Signum has
|
BMW 1 sērija has
| |