Opel Grandland 2017 vs Ford Kuga 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Opel Grandland engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Ford Kuga. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Grandland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Grandland consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Opel Grandland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Grandland consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Grandland gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Grandland might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
| Opel Grandland is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 2 cm wider, while the height of Opel Grandland is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 514 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1652 litres | no data | |
|
Opel Grandland has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Grandland has 58 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Grandland is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Opel Grandland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Opel Grandland has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 150 percent more cases than Opel Grandland, so Opel Grandland quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Grandland has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |