Opel Frontera 2001 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is a more dynamic driving. Opel Frontera engine produces 54 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 123 NM less than Nissan Pathfinder. Due to the lower power, Opel Frontera reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Frontera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Frontera consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Opel Frontera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Frontera consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Pathfinder gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Omega, Opel Sintra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Opel Frontera engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Opel Frontera is smaller. Opel Frontera is 8 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Frontera is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 389 litres | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | 2091 litres | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder has more luggage space. Opel Frontera has 126 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 301 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Frontera is 0.9 metres less than that of the Nissan Pathfinder, which means Opel Frontera can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 2`793 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Frontera has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |