Opel Frontera 1992 vs Nissan Terrano 1993

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Frontera
1992 - 1996
Nissan Terrano
1993 - 1996
Gearbox: Manual Manual
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Opel Frontera is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Terrano can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Opel Frontera also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.82.4 - 2.7

Performance

Power: 113 - 115 HP101 - 124 HP
Torque: 170 - 242 NM197 - 221 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.8 - 17.9 seconds14 - 19.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.9 - 12.110.1 - 11.4
Opel Frontera petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Terrano. On average, Opel Frontera equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.21 m4.58 m
Width: 1.78 m1.74 m
Height: 1.70 m1.81 m
Opel Frontera is 37 cm shorter than the Nissan Terrano, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Frontera is 11 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 300 litres115 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1160 litres1900 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Opel Frontera has 185 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Terrano. The Nissan Terrano may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Terrano (by 740 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Frontera is 0.9 metres less than that of the Nissan Terrano, which means Opel Frontera can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`303~ 2`580
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 800no data
Pros and Cons: Opel Frontera has
  • also available in 2WD
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Nissan Terrano has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv