Opel Frontera 1998 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Frontera
1998 - 2004
Jeep Grand Cherokee
1998 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Opel Frontera is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.2 - 3.22.7 - 4.7

Performance

Power: 115 - 205 HP140 - 258 HP
Torque: 200 - 290 NM295 - 425 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 - 15.8 seconds8.3 - 14 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.5 - 14.39.7 - 16.5
Opel Frontera petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Opel Frontera equipped with diesel engines consume 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 208 mm (8.2 inches)210 - 211 mm (8.3 - 8.3 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.61 m
Width: 1.79 m1.85 m
Height: 1.74 m1.79 m
Opel Frontera is 5 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Frontera is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 389 litres1104 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1790 litres2047 litres
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Opel Frontera has 715 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Opel Frontera uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 257 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Frontera is 0.4 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Opel Frontera can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`451~ 2`447
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 24003400
Pros and Cons: Opel Frontera has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
  • also available in 2WD
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv