Opel Crossland 2019 vs Opel Mokka 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Opel Crossland is more dynamic to drive. Opel Crossland engine produces 10 HP less power than Opel Mokka, but torque is 30 NM more than Opel Mokka. Despite less power, Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Crossland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Crossland consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Opel Crossland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Crossland consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Meriva, Opel Insignia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Opel Mokka engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Opel Crossland is smaller. Opel Crossland is 6 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Crossland is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | 1372 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Opel Crossland has 54 litres more trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The Opel Mokka may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 117 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.3 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`843 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |