Opel Crossland 2019 vs Renault Captur 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Opel Crossland is more dynamic to drive. Opel Crossland engine produces 10 HP more power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Renault Captur. Thanks to more power Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.5 | |
|
The Opel Crossland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Crossland consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that by driving the Opel Crossland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Opel Crossland gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Crossland might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.57 m | |
| Opel Crossland is 9 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Crossland is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | 1235 litres | |
|
Opel Crossland has more luggage capacity. Opel Crossland has 33 litres more trunk space than the Renault Captur. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Crossland (by 20 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Captur, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`744 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Renault Captur has
| |