Opel Crossland 2018 vs Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a more dynamic driving. Opel Crossland engine produces 8 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 3.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Crossland consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Crossland could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Crossland consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1380 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Opel Crossland is smaller, but slightly higher. Opel Crossland is 13 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Crossland is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has more luggage space. Opel Crossland has 90 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, so Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
| |