Opel Crossland 2018 vs Renault Captur 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Opel Crossland is more dynamic to drive. Opel Crossland engine produces 30 HP more power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Renault Captur. Thanks to more power Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 3.8 | |
| Opel Crossland consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Crossland could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Insignia, Citroen C4 Cactus, Citroen C3 Aircross | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Captur might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Opel Crossland engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.57 m | |
| Opel Crossland is 9 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Crossland is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | 1235 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Opel Crossland has 45 litres less trunk space than the Renault Captur. This could mean that the Opel Crossland uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Crossland (by 20 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Captur, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`855 | 1`759 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Renault Captur has
| |