Opel Crossland 2017 vs Renault Captur 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Captur is a more dynamic driving. Opel Crossland engine produces 10 HP less power than Renault Captur, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.5 | |
| Opel Crossland consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that by driving the Opel Crossland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Opel Combo, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Crossland might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.57 m | |
| Opel Crossland is 1 cm shorter than the Renault Captur, 5 cm wider, while the height of Opel Crossland is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | 1235 litres | |
|
Opel Crossland has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Crossland has 33 litres more trunk space than the Renault Captur. The Renault Captur may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Crossland (by 20 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Captur, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`805 | 1`744 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Renault Captur has
| |