Opel Combo 2001 vs Mazda Premacy 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.5 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda Premacy is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda Premacy, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Mazda Premacy. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.7 | |
|
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Combo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy, which means that by driving the Opel Combo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Mazda Premacy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.57 m | |
| Opel Combo is 2 cm longer than the Mazda Premacy, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 23 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1848 litres | |
|
Opel Combo has more luggage capacity. Opel Combo has 35 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |