Opel Combo 2001 vs Renault Scenic 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opel Combo is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Renault Scenic has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.7 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 87 HP | 85 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 - 165 NM | 127 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 - 18.5 seconds | 8.6 - 14.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 7.8 | 5.1 - 8.6 | |
|
Opel Combo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic. On average, Opel Combo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.62 m | |
| Opel Combo is 6 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
|
Opel Combo has more luggage capacity. Opel Combo has 49 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Opel Combo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`903 | ~ 1`959 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 6.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |