Opel Antara 2010 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 249 HP | 103 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 - 400 NM | 156 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 12 seconds | 9.5 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 9.3 | 4.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Opel Antara petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, Opel Antara equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Opel Antara is larger. Opel Antara is 26 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 7 cm wider, while the height of Opel Antara is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1420 litres | 1513 litres | |
| Opel Antara has 10 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 93 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 1.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`368 | ~ 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |