Opel Agila 2008 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Opel Agila engine produces 25 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Opel Agila reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.8 | |
|
The Opel Agila is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Agila consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Opel Agila over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Opel Agila is smaller, but higher. Opel Agila is 7 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Agila is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 225 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
660 litres | 760 litres | |
| Opel Agila has 5 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 100 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Agila is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Opel Agila can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`545 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Opel Agila has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Opel Agila, so Opel Agila quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Agila has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |