Nissan X-Trail 2003 vs Subaru Forester 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 65 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Subaru Forester. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| 500 km with real consumption | 500 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is larger. Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 406 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |