Nissan X-Trail 2001 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 49 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller. Nissan X-Trail is 10 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Nissan X-Trail has 694 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 206 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.9 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |