Nissan X-Trail 2001 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 14 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 88 NM more than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Nissan X-Trail 2001: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. Honda CR-V 1997: Car has Honda`s real-time four-wheel drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. Multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to clutch by dual pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | 670 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan X-Trail has 35 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 1171 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |