Nissan X-Trail 2001 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 5 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 59 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 258 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | 828 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 152 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 1013 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 1.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |