Nissan X-Trail 2001 vs Ford Maverick 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 114 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Ford Maverick is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 36 HP less power than Ford Maverick, but torque is 70 NM more than Ford Maverick. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 11.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 585 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
720 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Nissan X-Trail 2001: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. Ford Maverick 2000: The AWD system typically directs the majority of the engine`s power to the front wheels. If slippage is detected at the front, power is quickly redirected to the rear wheels via a Rotary Blade Coupling, which can transfer up to 100% of the power to rear axis. Switching the system from `Auto` to `On` locks the front and rear axles at a 50/50 split and reduces the reaction time needed to engage the rear wheels through an integrated bypass clutch. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.51 m | 4.44 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
Nissan X-Trail is 7 cm longer than the Ford Maverick, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 985 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | no data | |
Ford Maverick has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 575 litres less trunk space than the Ford Maverick. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`978 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |