Nissan X-Trail 2001 vs Ford Maverick 2004

 
Nissan X-Trail
2001 - 2003
Ford Maverick
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 114 HP150 HP
Torque: 270 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.7 seconds10.7 seconds
Ford Maverick is a more dynamic driving.
Nissan X-Trail engine produces 36 HP less power than Ford Maverick, but torque is 70 NM more than Ford Maverick. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.211.1
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km10.9 l/100km
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 585 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle550 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway720 km on highway
720 km with real consumption560 km with real consumption
Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Nissan X-Trail 2001: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating.

Ford Maverick 2000: The AWD system typically directs the majority of the engine`s power to the front wheels. If slippage is detected at the front, power is quickly redirected to the rear wheels via a Rotary Blade Coupling, which can transfer up to 100% of the power to rear axis. Switching the system from `Auto` to `On` locks the front and rear axles at a 50/50 split and reduces the reaction time needed to engage the rear wheels through an integrated bypass clutch.

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.44 m
Width: 1.76 m1.83 m
Height: 1.68 m1.76 m
Nissan X-Trail is 7 cm longer than the Ford Maverick, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 410 litres985 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1841 litresno data
Ford Maverick has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 575 litres less trunk space than the Ford Maverick. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`0501`978
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 20002000
Pros and Cons: Nissan X-Trail has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Ford Maverick has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv