Nissan X-Trail 2001 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 12 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 9.8 | |
| Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Primera, Nissan Serena, Nissan Sentra | Used also on Suzuki SX4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 59 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | 828 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 1.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |