Nissan X-Trail 2003 vs Land Rover Freelander 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 24 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 86 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Despite less power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera, Nissan Almera Tino | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Freelander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Freelander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 345 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 6600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |