Nissan X-Trail 2003 vs Jeep Cherokee 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 14 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 46 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Despite less power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera, Nissan Almera Tino | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.87 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 7 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 820 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 410 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 109 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |