Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail and Chevrolet Captiva have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Antara, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller. Nissan X-Trail and Chevrolet Captiva are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 479 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 930 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 14 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.7 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |